It can be the best of ski seasons. Or it can be the worst. It’s up to you and only you.
European nations are having a mighty tussle over whether or not to open their ski resorts, but it’s not even a question in the U.S., where many resorts are already open.
France, Germany and Italy, which learned the hard way in the spring that resorts could be centers for spread of the COVID-19 coronavirus, are leaning toward keeping resorts closed until after the first of the year. They are basing closures on fears of spread and ski injuries that could overwhelm hospitals.
Mountainous Austria and Switzerland, where people’s red blood cells must be shaped like skis, are going to allow their resorts to open.
In Colorado, state health experts drafted guidance in October that calls for “isolation housing” for guests that may become ill, need to quarantine and extend their stays. Hotels in most resorts reportedly are complying, and ski companies with employee housing are also leaving units available in order to isolate sick employees.
Colorado resorts have put out a “Save Our Season” call to both residents and visitors. It’s a timely and worthy call.
Smokey Bear has helped the U.S. Forest Service suppress wildfires for more than half a century. The ski industry may need to invent his cousins Ski Bear and Ski Squirrel to get the message out that only skiers can tamp down coronavirus in their resorts.
Until you’ve experienced it, it is hard to understand how dangerous a single misstep in observing coronavirus prevention can be. A healthy person one day can be spreading coronavirus the next.
Droplets from a single cough or sneeze can hang in the air for hours waiting for an unwitting victim to walk through and inhale them. A single person not wearing a mask who forgets to observe the 6-foot distancing guideline can exhale enough virus to infect others close by. One infected person can quickly become 15, 25, 50 or 100. It’s the worst game of tag ever imagined.
With proper safeguards, alpine skiing should be a relatively safe sport. Unlike football, basketball or volleyball, it’s an individual sport. Athletes don’t need to clump together. Even on chairlifts, it’s possible to remain distant from others by riding alone or only with immediate family.
Sun Valley Resort can’t keep Bald Mountain open on its own, but everything depends on it doing so. It needs healthy workers to staff the mountain. It needs a medical system with healthy workers and enough hospital beds to care for injured skiers and boarders. Consequently, it needs the help of everyone who skis or boards here.
Humility is the key to keeping the mountain open, jobs intact and our communities healthy. Self-centered indifference to others’ safety will slam the brakes on the season faster than anyone can say “Slalom.”
This is a season to set entitlement aside. You are not special. The virus gives no one a pass, even for a minute. No one likes wearing masks and no one likes social distancing. No one loves putting their ski boots on in the parking lot when there’s a warm lodge nearby.
We do these things to live to hike another day and ski another day. We do it to protect jobs and family livelihoods. We do it because we want our friends around for next year’s skiing and boarding adventures. We do it because we remember the gloom and the contagion of the spring when coronavirus shut down the mountain, the hospital and our towns.
One way or another, every person in the valley is dependent on keeping operations on Bald Mountain healthy. Closure would mean long-lasting harm.
Only you can keep Baldy open.
“Our View” represents the opinion of the newspaper editorial board, which is made up of members of its board of directors. Remarks may be directed to editorialboard@mtexpress.com.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(9) comments
"Closure would mean long-lasting harm"
Delusional. What is more long lasting than death? 3000 deaths a day and rising fast. How many before this newspaper will put life before income?
The idea that closing the mountain will cause "long lasting harm" is ridiculous. I spent 40 years on that mountain. We survived many a lean Xmas and so did you. Closing it to curtail the run away pandemic would be a sane approach, and might also slow the unhealthy real estate boom more than affordable housing lip service on these pages.
But such a editorial position would require courage and sacrifice as opposed to posturing and pandering to your advertising base and readership. A significant number would be outraged and no doubt you would pay a price.
So let's just take a political approach and let others pay the real price of incredibly iresponisble behavior. We can console the loved ones, right?
Scare mongering about "long lasting harm" is beyond the pale, Mountain Express, way past just keeping your head down on issues that could hurt your bottomline.
Ski bear and ski squirrel should fix everything. Provided they are wearing masks.....
The IME says it's up to us??
How about SV Co.?
I met a Baldy employee who had worked 5 shifts during their first week in Idaho from a neighboring state.
The employee lives in the dorms...with TWO other roommates. In one room. The three of them do not work in the same department, so they are exposed to the full range of Resort visitors.
And they sleep in the same room every night.
Is it really up to us???
The company didn’t care about the employees who got sick with COVID last season while working at the mountain, does anyone think they care about guests? Far from it. They failed the character test a long time ago.
Omg.. who cares if people die? As long as SVC gets their money.
Please figure out a better way to line people up for the lifts. The maze at Lookout Express #5 is horribly designed for social distancing. It’s only going to get more crowded as we get closer to Christmas. There has to be a better way to keep people at least six feet apart.
You really only care care about your skiing experience, don't you?
It's a constructive critisism - what's your problem with it? You have no response to the actual horrible comments above though.
The point being made applies at Atkinsons/Albertsons. Why do they open adjacent checkout lanes and force everyone to be close to each other?
SVCo had all summer to plan on keeping people apart. They didn't change a thing about the maze at #5. (It wasn't good in the past either.) SVCo is trying however there are some deficiencies and they need to be pointed out and remedied for our health, the local economy, and skiing experience. SVCo no matter how diligent and expert the efforts are they can be undone by their customers in short order. Some skiiers are uncooperative and are intentionally defying the mask mandates already others are just clueless.
Where's our buddy Maggie.....he's been awol since 11/3?
It’s whining. The two comments above don’t deserve a response.
A skier has to know that they are already going into a high-risk environment. We know that from the ski season last year, where CV-19 blew up at least partially in that environment. Tourists from who-knows-where, and what strain they may be bringing in, and they haven’t been screened or had any quarantine restrictions. Going skiing, you decided to accept the known risks. I believe business must go on, and operating should not have burdensome hurdles placed in their way. People can choose the risks they want to take. If you don’t like the environment you see, stay home.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In