Plans to develop a high-profile property on Main Street in downtown Ketchum are moving forward after a series of delays.
The Ketchum Planning and Zoning Commission advanced a 22,000-square-foot project with three retail spaces, five market-rate residential units and private garages to final design review on Tuesday, one step closer to the final review of the project by the Ketchum City Council.
The project, which is located between Fourth and Fifth streets on a site colloquially called “Hot Dog Hill,” has a somewhat tumultuous history. Last year, a larger version of the project was rejected by the Planning and Zoning Commission. At the time, developer Chris Ensign of Utah-based Solstice Development criticized the decision as one of “an elitist community.”
The previous rendition of the project proposed to develop the entire half-block along Main Street between Fourth and Fifth streets. However, the northern section of the property—where Formula Sports was previously located—was sold to another developer for a separate project.
Peter Paulos, a representative of PH Architects, described the major changes made to the plans based on previous comments from the P&Z and the public.
The first submission to the P&Z was a building that mostly featured glass, along with brick and steel. The new rendition reviewed for the first time Tuesday has much less glass, as well as horizontal wood paneling designed to better match the look of Main Street. The front facade would be about 39 feet high and the rear facade would be about 42 feet.
Additionally, underground parking was eliminated.
“We’re not digging down beneath this building. We’re trying to follow the natural contour and slope of the site, hence why the garages are up at the alley elevation,” Paulos said.
The discussion Tuesday was much tamer than previous hearings, as P&Z commissioners were generally in favor of the building’s design.
“I like the industrial look, especially the glass and steel details,” Commissioner Tim Carter said.
“From a design perspective, I like this building,” Commissioner Spencer Cordovano said. “I was driving down Main Street and all the buildings are brick, brick and brick. I think it matches the feel of downtown.”
Cordovano said “the height might be more radical than a lot of us would like to see, but it fits the code.”
The development-review process began in November 2020 when Ensign first presented to the P&Z. The combative design-review hearing took place the following February. Following that meeting, Ensign formally appealed the commission’s decision to the City Council, but rescinded it in fall 2021. Since then, the applicants have been working to redesign the project from its original four parcels of land to the two parcels included in the most recent design.
Commissioner Mattie Mead expressed conditional support for moving the submission forward out of pre-design review. He said that he wants to see the applicant consider adding community-housing units, increasing commercial density, and reducing the size of the housing units to increase density.
Cordovano expressed worry that the commercial units—at around 1,300 square feet each—are too large and the rent would be too costly.
“Right now, those retail units would go for about $4,500 a month, and I don’t know who is going to pay that,” he said.
Notably, because the project does not include any community housing, the applicants would have to pay a fee of more than $900,000 to the city. That total is based on a formula that takes into account the size of the building. Projects can be larger if they include community housing or pay a housing “in-lieu” fee. The funds would be put towards community-housing efforts elsewhere in the city. The original project that was rejected last year included community-housing units.
“We need to decide if that trade-off is worthwhile,” Carter said.
Because the proposal has four floors, it must go to City Council for approval after final design review by the P&Z. The next P&Z meeting is June 14. 
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(10) comments
Cordavano thinks the commercial space is too expensive ? Not at $18 a sandwich and labor at $7.25 an hour.
Why are these local governments allowed to change the character and appeal of Ketchum? Who votes for these people?
Ketchum's character is going to change for the worse regardless of building policy honestly. Going to join Elkhorn as the land of second homes, retirees, and a smattering of remote workers. Throw in the equivalent of lottery winners if the city ever does subsidized housing on any kind of scale. The only thing holding back the tidal wave right now are landlords who aren't maximizing profits or selling.
In addition to the comments by others I would like to point out that there is no relationship between the building Dave Wilson is doing on Main Street and this project on Main Street. Also, good luck on getting affordable housing in this project, as Perry pointed out the City needs the in lieu housing funds to continue to fund Bluebird and ease the financing issues Mr. Dunfield has in order to move forward with a building permit.
I totally agree with the other comments. I have been coming to Sun Valley Ketchum since 1966 And what I know is that we are totally losing our Ketchum feel and also for sightlines to Baldy. It sounds like the only thing we have left is to hope and pray that the council does the right thing and not let four stories happen!!!! Non-local developers are only interested in money they’re in their out and we are left with the consequences
@stromsie: guess what comes after four stories? In the tourist zone let Limelight go to 5 stories. And guess how many stories the Marriott will be? Yes, you are right—6!. The broke the zoning code to let it do that. And you must have missed the Mayor’s attempt at an emergency zoning ordinance to actually require taller buildings in the commercial core. This administration is 100% behind citifying Ketchum and accommodating the wishes of out of state developers.
Putting up four story buildings on Main Street without requiring a fourth story set back will destroy sight lines to the mountains. If you are hoping for the Council to protect quality of life issues for residents, you will be sorely disappointed. They already changed the zoning code to let Bluebird go up 4 stories straight from the sidewalk in the commercial center zone. That sets the precedent. I doubt they will put up any objection to Hot Dog Hill at all. They need the $1mm in lieu of fee payment from that development to go to increase the subsidy to the for profit developer of Bluebird.
It’s not the P&Z fault. It’s the zoning code. We need to revamp it by out our leaders are showing zero leadership on that. As they have done for almost 5 years now. This building is a UT developer and a CT architect. All they know is what the planning department tells them. They don’t care about Ketchum, just about how much money they can make off of Ketchum. They have no problem going to 4 stories and setting a new height precedent for CC1 and Main Street. The P&Z commissioners should have pushed back on this. At the very least could they not step back the 4th floor? And the planning dept is fine with them not putting any community housing in this. The $1mm in lieu of fee is slated to go to Bluebird, above and beyond what was handed over at the last Bluebird meeting. This money was specifically referenced at that meeting as part of the blank check approach to Bluebird. Cost and hogher use of taxpayer money is not a consideration by the Council.
lol
4 story building on Main street....OMG! who even recognizes main street anymore?
P&Z is a disgrace. Shame on all of you. You are an insult to this community and you have destroyed it.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In