A group of mountain biking advocates and industry leaders flew over an area in the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains on Thursday to highlight an effort to designate about 591,000 acres in the area as a national monument.
An alternative wilderness bill is pending in Congress that would protect 275,665 acres in the area, but keep mountain bikers out of most areas.
“There is a role for the mountain biking industry to elevate the campaign for national monument status,” said International Mountain Bicycling Association Communications Manager Aaron Clark.
Clark spoke to a group of flyover participants at Friedman Memorial Airport before they disembarked in groups of five for a one-hour flight north to Castle Peak in the White Cloud Mountains in a Cessna 210, piloted by Ecoflight founder and Executive Director Bruce Gordon. The flights were co-sponsored by the Wood River Bicycle Coalition, a local chapter of IMBA.
IMBA is a nonprofit educational organization with an annual budget of $5.6 million and 200 local chapters nationwide with other independent affiliates around the world. The organization advocates for mountain bike trail access, sustainable trail development and public policies that are friendly to mountain bikes.
“We want to protect the places we ride. That’s what led us into land protection,” said Clark.
IMBA, established in 1988, provided mountain bike trail design and consultation eight years ago for Sun Valley Co.’s Gun Club Trail around a Sun Valley golf course.
A proposed Boulder-White Clouds National Monument was first proposed by then-Secretary of the Interior and former Idaho Gov. Dirk Kempthorne in 2008, though it was never presented to President George W. Bush for approval. The idea was resurrected in July 2010 by former Idaho Gov. Cecil Andrus—also a former secretary of the Interior—in a letter to President Barack Obama.
However, on July 2, Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, succeeded in getting a bill to protect three areas in the Boulder-White Cloud Mountains as wilderness to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives without objection from the House Natural Resources Committee.
“More than 20 mountain biking trails would be closed under this bill, but IMBA will not compromise on two, Castle Divide and Ants Basin,” said Clark in an interview. “These trails are not causing any environmental or social concerns right now. There is no viable reason for shutting them out. We think wilderness can be achieved while leaving these two trails open through special bike corridor provisions.”
The flyover group also included Rich Cook, director of development for IMBA; Brett Stevenson, president of the Wood River Bicycle Coalition (local IMBA affiliate); Mark Bettinger and Zach Waterman of the Sierra Club; Jessica Klodnicki, the general manager of Bell Helmets; Chris Sugai, president of Niner Bikes; Jenn Dice, the Washington, D.C., lobbyist for People for Bikes; Luther Propst, board member of the Outdoor Alliance; and Vernon Felton, a writer for Bike magazine and Mountain magazine.
Cook said based on ideal and challenging terrain through which these “marquee trails” extend, his organization was considering naming them as “IMBA epics,” a designation that would draw attention to them within the international mountain biking community.
Clark said IMBA sent a letter to Simpson and Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, signed by 60 outdoor business owners asking to keep the two trails open to mountain bikes.
Simpson responded on his official website, saying, “While I am not a mountain biker, I have been told by members of the mountain bike community that my bill will continue to provide a wide variety of back country experiences for mountain bikers, from beginner to advanced-expert, on some of the most rugged and scenic high elevation trails in the United States.
“For those advanced-expert mountain bikers, we leave open the epic Bowery Loop to the East Fork (Germania Creek Trail and Grand Prize/West Fork of East Fork Trails). This allows for loop access from Smiley Creek to the East Fork of the Salmon River and back—described as “abusive” in a mountain biking guidebook. This grueling 30-mile loop lies between the proposed White Clouds and Hemingway-Boulders Wildernesses.
“Additionally, the difficult Garland Lakes/Martin Creek Trail to Warm Springs Meadow, and Rough Creek and Lookout Mountain trails will remain open. Riders will see incredible scenery as they head up the Big and Little Casino Creek Trails, as well as the Boundary Creek, Gladiator Creek and Galena Gulch Trails.
“Mountain bikers who want to access the solitude of high mountain lakes can ride the Frog Lake Loop to remote Frog Lake and the Fourth of July Trail to Fourth of July Lake and Washington Lake. For a one of a kind ride, Railroad Ridge will remain open to mountain bikes. There is no place on earth like Railroad Ridge for views, scenery, fauna, geology and tranquility.”
Much of the area covered by the Boulder and White Cloud mountains—on the east side of state Highway 75 between Ketchum and Stanley—is included in the Sawtooth National Recreation Area. That designation protects it from development that would substantially impair its scenic and recreational values. However, many conservationists have feared an expansion of motorized recreational use in the area, and have advocated wilderness designation to prevent that.
In 2005, Rep. Simpson introduced his Central Idaho Economic Development and Recreation Act, which would have protected part of the area as wilderness while allowing most existing motorized use and providing economic benefits to Custer County. The bill never made it out of Congress, due partly to opposition from Risch and Idaho Gov. Butch Otter. Simpson’s revised bill, however, appears to have more support from the Idaho congressional delegation.
Tony Evans: tevans@mtexpress.com
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(7) comments
Securing this place is a good idea, but I think that natural beauty of this place should not be disturbed. Fencing this area will help securing this area, but making it a national monument might attract unwanted attention. There are ways through which you can secure this area and dissertation writing service shares them without having to disturb its natural beauty.
Local - I'm an avid biker and the White Clouds' trails are amazing to ride (I support WRBC). However, the protection of wild places is my first priority. This is the single most important value and the primary reason I choose to live here. Ketchum is crowded, but the wild character of the public lands is much more alive here than in adjacent communities that do not favor protection if favor or grazing and motorized. I support protection in the best legal form that can be attained and will live with a change in my use if necessary. I support a monument for sure - I wish it included the Sawtooths just so it would make sense tho. I also support (W)ilderness for the B/WC's, if it provides more meaningful protection. Just curious, who do you consider local for this paper and this issue? Fairfield? Mackay? Challis? Stanley? Points in between?
Idahoans
What is "meaningful protection" ?
preserving natural conditions without more than nominal degradation by development, grazing or recreation...
I worry this hybrid monument will solidify harmful uses in perpetuity (not mtn biking). Not that Simpson's Wilderness bill offers much either. It seems like users are putting their respective methods of access above preserving the wild character of the place, which, ironically, is the reason most want access. When I ride in the White Clouds I have two basic experiences: challenges/enjoyment of riding, and enjoying an amazing, wild place. I can find challenging, fun rides anywhere. The flyover in the article above appears to be focused on the natural beauty and wild character of the area - not any particular method of access, yet those values seem to be secondary to the intent of the proposal. Maybe I'm slow witted and confused...
I don't mean this as an opposing view to the monument proposal. If it's the best we can do then it will have to do. I'm just a little bummed that the bighorn sheep and the wolverines are somehow collateral to the conversation about access and grazing. I think protecting habitat should be first priority. Just my .02.
Wilderness.... clean ,simple, cheap.....western.
Would LOCAL bikers please speak up.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In