Friday, May 9, 2014

Custer, Blaine trade views on monument

First joint meeting of boards of commissioners


By GREG MOORE
Express Staff Writer

Custer County Commissioners Wayne Butts, left, Doyle Lamb, center, and Lin Hintze provided their perspectives on the proposed creation of a Boulder White-Clouds National Monument at Carolís Dollar Mountain Lodge on Wednesday. Photo by Roland Lane

    A joint meeting between the Blaine and Custer county commissioners on Wednesday did not appear to change any minds about a proposed Boulder-White Clouds National Monument, but did result in an agreement to invite federal officials to the area to answer questions.
    The Custer commissioners also announced a date of Thursday, May 29, for a second joint meeting, at 6 p.m. at the Challis Events Center.
    The meeting at Carol’s Dollar Mountain Lodge in Sun Valley was prompted by Blaine County Commissioner Larry Schoen with the intent of allowing both boards to listen to opposing views and explore potential common interests. The Blaine County commissioners have passed a resolution supporting a monument and the Custer County commissioners have passed a resolution opposing it.
National monument designation would occur through a proclamation signed by President Barrack Obama under the Antiquities Act. About 91 percent of the proposed 592,000-acre monument in the Boulder and White Cloud mountains would be in Custer County.
    A dozen Custer County residents were in the audience of about 80 people. Seventeen people from both counties voiced their opinions during a public comment period; all but four expressed opposition to or at least skepticism toward designation of a national monument.
    The Custer County commissioners especially questioned proponents’ claims that a monument would provide an economic boost to their county.
    “When these wilderness things come in, it hasn’t really helped us,” Commissioner Lin Hintze said.
    He also said national monument designation would prohibit mining, which is an important component of Custer County’s economy. The Thompson Creek molybdenum mine northwest of Clayton is the county’s largest employer, currently employing about 200 people.
    As proposed, a national monument would significantly expand the acreage protected by the Sawtooth National Recreation Area by including the East Fork of the Salmon River basin, much of which is grazed by cattle. The Idaho Conservation League has said it would support continued cattle grazing there, but a grazing management plan would not be finalized until after a monument is proclaimed.
    “In Custer County, we really depend on the ranching,” Commissioner Doyle Lamb said. “Mackay is dying and Arco, which is right next to a national monument, has been dying for years, so I really don’t see the economic benefit.”
    Though his organization has taken no stand on the issue, Sun Valley Economic Development Executive Director Harry Griffith said increased tourism from monument designation would proportionally benefit Custer County’s economy more than it would Blaine’s. He said studies of similar designations indicate an economic boost of between $100,000 and $1 million annually to the county.
    However, Doyle said an increase in tourism would put a strain on Custer County’s small emergency services agencies.
    “We don’t have the tax base that you guys have, and our EMS system really suffers when we get the tourists,” he said.
    Ketchum resident David Sundholm questioned whether the studies that have shown economic benefits from national monument or wilderness designations have been of areas that already have a lot of protected land nearby, as Custer County does.
    Campbell Gardett, a resident of the tiny town of Chilly in the Lost River Valley, cautioned that monument designation could reduce control by local residents.
    “I don’t think there’s an understanding of the forces that will be unleashed,” he said. “I think the effect on Custer County would be to wipe out a slower way of life than there is in Blaine County.”
    Sawtooth Society Executive Director Gary O’Malley said another level of management should be added only if a “clear and compelling case” could be made that it would provide better protection.
    “In spite of working closely with the advocates over the past few years, we believe that no such case can be made,” he said.
    In mid-April, the Sawtooth Society sent a letter to Obama opposing monument designation.
    Robert Boren, who lives between Salmon and Challis, questioned proponents’ claims that a national monument would benefit wildlife, including anadromous fish.
    “What’s wrong with what’s being done now, and how would we do that differently?” he asked.
    He urged both boards of commissioners to seek answers to why and how the monument would be created before reaching any conclusions about supporting or opposing it.
    Hailey resident Bob Rosso urged the Custer County commissioners to consider whether some version of a national monument might provide benefits to their county, including help with emergency services funding.
    Rosso said that during a visit to Washington, D.C., about the issue, he was informed by Department of Interior officials that “if we don’t all come together, if we don’t speak as one, this won’t happen.”
    Commissioner Schoen suggested that before proceeding much further, both counties should get answers to the questions raised by officials and the public. The Custer County commissioners agreed to sign a letter inviting federal officials to Idaho.
    However, Custer County Commissioner Wayne Butts said federal bureaucrats are not likely to be able to make the trip in time for the May 29 meeting in Challis. Schoen agreed that fall is a more realistic target, though members of the state’s congressional delegation might be able to attend the Challis meeting.
    “I hope we’ll get into some more issues and continue the public process,” Blaine County Commissioner Angenie McCleary said. “I don’t think anyone’s going to create a national monument without input from what we want here.”




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads





Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.