Friday, June 28, 2013

Narrow Supreme Court majorities erode confidence


This week saw the end of a momentous term as the U.S. Supreme Court announced decisions on voting rights protection, affirmative action and gay marriage.
    In a nation based on the rule of law rather than the principle that might makes right, the Supreme Court is America’s untouchable institution. Justices are appointed for life so they cannot be penalized for their decisions. Commenting on the validity or folly of decisions is just fine; attacking the justices themselves is generally considered out of bounds.
    As deeply divided as the country is on so many issues, it is hardly surprising that the Supreme Court, with all its pomp and circumstance, has not been able to avoid being a player in the political fray.
    Reverence for all of our political institutions has fallen and with it so has support for the Supreme Court. Only 44 percent of Americans say they approve of the judgment and fairness of the court. In 1994, that number was 80 percent.
    Recognizing that citizens often have deep-seated objections to their decisions, the Supreme Court has often worked to achieve a strong majority in especially controversial decisions.
    For example, when the court ruled that separate could never be equal in Brown vs. Board of Education, which ended government-approved racial segregation, Chief Justice Earl Warren made sure the opinion was 9-0. “Impeach Earl Warren” read billboards and bumper stickers around the country, but respect for the court remained firm.
    Two decisions this week alone were decided in a 5-4 split. Chief Justice John Roberts came into the position saying he wanted to find consensus so that rulings would reflect a clear majority. He has to be concerned that he has been unable to slow down the now historically large number of 5-4 decisions.
    This narrow majority, especially on major questions, implies that maybe the law of the land really isn’t, quite. If one side of the political divide can just elect a president from their party, or put a full-court press on one justice, or even hold up a nomination, everything changes. The law becomes just another political prize.
    Without respect and acceptance of its authority to define our law, the Supreme Court risks losing its authority and the country risks losing its willingness to live by those laws, especially those with which some strongly disagree.
    Since Marbury v. Madison, the 1803 landmark ruling that formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review, this has been a defining characteristic of the American system.
    Woe be to all of us if it ends.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.