Friday, May 10, 2013

Ketchum whitewater park is back on track

Frugal BLM canít afford to maintain land


By BRENNAN REGO
Express Staff Writer

A section of the Big Wood River near Hulen Meadows, above, could become part of a whitewater park if a federal land transfer is completed by the city of Ketchum. Express file photo

    After years of doggedly gnawing through seemingly endless rolls of federal red tape in pursuit of a deed-restricted transfer of about 316 acres of land from the Bureau of Land Management to Ketchum, the city’s Parks and Recreation Department has reported that the BLM—frugal following federal budget cuts known as the “sequester”—is now eager to get the land off its hands.
    The transfer would allow the Ketchum Parks and Recreation Department to build a whitewater park at the site, near Hulen Meadows subdivision north of Ketchum. In March, the department reported to the City Council that it expected indefinite delays to the land transfer—and therefore to the whitewater park project—due to the BLM’s lack of funds. At a City Council meeting on Monday, Parks and Recreation Director Jennifer Smith said the transfer is now on an “aggressive timeline” and construction on the whitewater park could begin as soon as the fall of 2014. The city first applied for the transfer in 2008.
    “It’s remarkable it’s still moving forward,” she said. “[The BLM] is being very cooperative at this point and we acknowledge that.”
    To maintain the forward momentum, the council unanimously agreed to Smith’s request that the city provide $50,000 in administrative support to the BLM, paid for entirely by private donations from the Wood River Land Trust and the Whitewater Park Committee. Those organizations are the city’s partners in the land transfer effort, the main focus of which is based on conservation. The BLM will use the money to hire an independent contractor to review an environmental assessment of the whitewater park project. Otherwise, the BLM would not have had the funds to review the assessment, effectively halting the project and the transfer.
    “This will definitely expedite the process, to have the review contractor, by leaps and bounds,” said Cherise McLain, an attorney for the city.
    According to McLain, Ketchum will maintain veto power over contractors selected by the BLM.
    “It’s not just a free bank account for the BLM to do with what they want,” she said.
    The council also unanimously agreed to another request by Smith for the city to manage and maintain the land for the BLM for free until the transfer occurs. Since 2006, the BLM has paid the Parks and Recreation Department $2,500 per year to do so, but the agency recently advised the city that it cannot afford to continue paying up.
    “It’s in the best interest of the community and the [transfer] for the city to continue to maintain the land [for free],” Smith said.
    Lastly, the council unanimously approved Smith’s request for the Parks and Recreation Department staff to begin work on the final design process for the park. Smith said she will return in June to request about $300,000 from the council to pay for that process, split over fiscal years 2013 and 2014 so as to not be such a large amount in the same budget. She said private donations will cover those costs as well. She said private donations should also cover the about $2.3 million price tag to construct the park.
    “That’s kind of our strategy,” said Mayor Randy Hall. “It’s better for the government to pay for the ugly stuff [like battling the red tape]. Private donors will be more likely to pay for the fun stuff like the drop features.”
    A drop feature is a whitewater rapid or waterfall integrated into a whitewater park.
    Council President Baird Gourlay voiced concern that there might be insufficient private donations to cover the construction costs.
    “I’m scared to death of this one,” he said.
    Councilwoman Nina Jonas said that it’s been the private donors who have kept the project going over the years.
    “I understand Baird’s anxiety,” Smith said. “But I think it’s a wonderful investment in my community.”
    In an interview after the meeting, Smith said the project would provide river play, flood mitigation and habitat restoration, including restoration of the currently sediment-threatened Hulen Meadows Pond. At the meeting, Hulen Meadows resident Jim Jaquet, former Ketchum city administrator, said the whitewater park project is the “only opportunity” to restore the pond and that the project would benefit the whole community.
    In the past, the plan has been contested by several Hulen Meadows residents who raised concerns about the project, including the park’s design and the traffic it would generate in the area. There was no public comment against the project at the meeting on Monday. To view the current, not final, version of the master plan for the park, visit tinyurl.com/ime-masterplan.
    “Luckily, we got the process back on track,” Hall said.


Brennan Rego: brego@mtexpress.com




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.