Friday, May 10, 2013

Board votes to fund airport tower

Facility set to stay open through Sept. 30


The air traffic control tower at Friedman Memorial Airport will remain open through Sept. 30, due to a unanimous Airport Authority vote to fund it from airport operating reserves. Photo by Roland Lane

The Friedman Memorial Airport air traffic control tower will remain open through September, airport officials decided on Tuesday.
    The Friedman Memorial Airport Authority on Tuesday voted unanimously to pay about $170,000 to fund the air traffic control tower through Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year. The money will come from operational reserves and will not require a budget amendment.
    Airport Manager Rick Baird said during the meeting Tuesday that the action was necessary, despite action from Congress late last month that provided the Federal Aviation Administration with $253 million that would enable them to cut air traffic controller furloughs short and fund air traffic control towers through the end of fiscal year 2013.
    The reason is that the legislation lacks specific language directing the FAA to use that money to fund 149 towers that are operated under contract and were slated for closure in June. Baird said the FAA has not stated whether or not it will keep the federal contract towers—one of which is Friedman—open.
    “The bottom line is, Congress said, ‘Here, FAA, here’s $253 million. You have listened to the discussion in both the House and the Senate,’” Baird said. “‘You understand we want you to use this $253 million to reduce furloughs and keep the towers.’ [But] the FAA still remains silent on the 149 contract towers.”
    Since then, 112 members of Congress and a coalition of 70 city mayors—including Hailey Mayor Fritz Haemmerle—have sent letters to the FAA directing them to use that money as was intended by Congress.
    “I am being told that these particular numbers of bipartisan support for anything is very unusual,” Baird said. “I don’t know how many voters these people represent, but it has got to be significant.”
    Baird said that in the meantime, the FAA has directed Friedman staff to address how they would operate to keep taxiways safe when commercial aircraft such as the Bombardier Q-400 and Embraer 120 are landing and taking off.


“I think it’s going to demonstrate that you cannot provide that sterile taxiway without a tower, and if you don’t have that sterile taxiway, you have no air service.”
Rick Baird
Friedman Memorial Airport manager


    The Q-400, used by Horizon Air, currently operates under a letter of agreement between the air traffic control tower and the airport, which states that the tower will “sterilize”—or completely clear—the taxiways when the Q-400 is operating on the runway. Because the Q-400 exceeds the airport’s design standards, such a letter is required for the craft to operate at Friedman.
    No such letter has been required for the Embraer 120, operated by SkyWest Airlines.
    But Baird said that the FAA is now requiring him to explain how he would clear the taxiway for operations for both aircraft, and have those procedures approved by the FAA.
    Baird said he believes a study of alternatives, set to be conducted by Boise firm T-O Engineers, will show that the airport needs a tower to keep the taxiway clear.
    “I think it’s going to demonstrate that you cannot provide that sterile taxiway without a tower, and if you don’t have that sterile taxiway, you have no air service,” he said. “You have no SkyWest or Horizon operations at all.”
    The board agreed to fund the tower from June 16, the day it was first set to close, through Sept. 30.
    Originally, the FAA had offered to allow the tower to remain in the federal air traffic control system through July 15. However, Baird said the agreement required to do so will likely not be signed by Serco, the company that operates the air traffic control tower, because of various restrictive conditions.
    Baird said airport staff are still working with the FAA and Serco to resolve the issues.


Kate Wutz: kwutz@mtexpress.com




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.