Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Sober compromise needed to manage Idaho forests


When it comes to the state’s taking management of our national forests, I think you need to be careful what you wish for. I sympathize with the frustration stemming from the U.S. Forest Service’s blocking access and watching our forests burn; however, it is a broken system. Educated biologists, ecologists, hydrologists, fire and fuel specialists and silviculture professionals come up with a plan but it is usually appealed by radicals who oppose any logging in the national forest.

On the other hand, the state took the word “public” out of the Department of Lands decades ago. They attempt to run it like a corporation to maximize revenue to the endowments (but are not that good at it). The department has gradually become a top-down organization, reducing foresters and increasing bureaucrats in Boise and Coeur d’Alene.

I worked for the department for 33 years and was awarded Forester of the Year for conducting economical all-age forest management (selective logging). I retired early when dictated to that management would be even age, on a 45- to 60-year rotation, with one-size-fits-all forestry.

In a perfect world, organizations like the Clearwater Basin Collaborative would involve reasonable people and debate, make natural resource recommendations based on science and prevent a minority from appealing the process. The state would be run like a B corporation, which allows for intrinsic values like viewsheds, wildlife cover, recreation and multi-age forest stands. The cost to the endowments would be inconsequential and the public could enjoy the land.

Thom Hawkins

Winchester




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads





Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.