Wednesday, February 6, 2013

ARCH project story was incomplete


    The story “ARCH project set for federal funding request” in the Jan. 25 issue was very incomplete and biased. We all understand the need of affordable housing in our town and commend the efforts of our leaders to provide it.  However, the Evergreen project has many problems that were addressed at the recent meeting but not reported in the article.
Major issues are:
- Does not meet P&Z requirements: parking, open space, storage, appearance.
- Legality of money being used from the city’s Open Door Program.
- Opposition to the design appearance by surrounding neighbors.
    West Ketchum neighbors have hired an attorney to insure that the values of our properties are protected by current P&Z regulations and to try to prevent the misuse of funds to a favored project. We all know that the City Council has already made many concessions to advance the Evergreen project—waiver of $100,000 in city fees and providing $100,000 from the Open Door Program. Now they even want to go further by allowing zoning variances to regulations that are in place to improve our city and to protect property owners.
    This project is not viable as it now stands; it must be reduced in size to conform to our laws and our neighborhood, or it must be abandoned.    
Ares Zarkos
Ketchum


    Editor’s note: A Dec. 14 story about the Ketchum Planning and Zoning Commission’s review of the proposed ARCH project reported on the neighbors’ opposition to the plan. The story discussed neighbors’ disapproval and noted that a group of about 100 property owners had hired attorney Gary Slette to represent their interests in the matter. Slette was quoted in the story. The Jan. 25 story focused more on the City Council’s discussion of and actions taken on the proposal.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.