Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Hailey botched Old Cutters deal


    In response to John Campbell’s misrepresenting a judge’s “opinion” as fact, it is my “opinion” that $3.5 million doesn’t even begin to cover the long-term costs of the Old Cutter’s development to the citizens of Hailey. Mr. Campbell is probably correct that the workforce housing requirement is illegal, as decisions establishing precedent are on the record. The city attorney believes he has somehow immunized Hailey from this interpretation of statute by the courts.
    The real news in this continuing debacle is that there was not an inter-creditor agreement in place that predetermines the outcome should there be a default on payment. Apparently such a document is standard operating procedure in an agreement involving a city, a bank and development interests borrowing money from said bank.  The abject failure of elected officials and their counsel to secure Hailey’s position using such a commonplace instrument needs considerable explanation.
    If there is a competent litigator confident in the merits of Hailey’s case and willing to represent the city on a contingency basis, by all means hold Mr. Campbell accountable to the agreement upon which he placed his signature.  If not, move on.  
    Any equation with the variables of attorneys, real estate developers and government signifies disaster for private-sector working citizens struggling to survive in this valley. Fellow citizens, please remember this Old Cutter’s train wreck when Quigley Green LLC returns with a proposal for a much larger disaster and literally decades of litigation for you to subsidize.
William F. Hughes
Hailey




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



-->
 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.