Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Rural manacles for urban voters?


Some Idaho legislators aren’t happy that voters overturned so-called education “reform” laws by big margins in referendums on the ballot in November.

Senate State Affairs Committee Chair Curt McKenzie, R-Nampa, now wants to make it harder for voters to contradict legislative wisdom or to pass laws by initiative even though it’s not exactly easy even under current law.

In addition to meeting strict deadlines and rules for circulating petitions, backers of initiatives or referendums currently must collect the signatures of 6 percent of legally qualified voters in the last election. For the ballot measures in November, that was more than 12,000 verified signatures.

McKenzie wants those signatures to come from 22 of Idaho’s 35 legislative districts. He’s sponsoring the stricter requirements at the behest of the Farm Bureau, which fears that animal cruelty initiatives aimed at restricting farming practices could make the ballot if urban voters misunderstand methods used to raise livestock.

McKenzie’s measure sounds benign, but it’s not. It’s an attempt to handcuff urban voters with rural manacles and to frustrate ballot measures that may be supported by urban voters. The Legislature tried this once before in 1997 by requiring signatures from 22 counties, which federal courts ruled unconstitutional.

Would it really be so bad if voters imposed laws requiring that livestock be treated well? We think not.

What would be bad is to make the hurdles for initiatives or referendums so high that they unfairly deprive voters of the constitutional right to govern themselves.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.