Friday, December 21, 2012

Editorials ignore airport’s impacts


Fritz Haemmerle

By FRITZ X. HAEMMERLE

I will respond to the Idaho Mountain Express editorial board’s commentary, “No alternative isn’t an alternative,” published Dec. 12. The opinion was critical of a letter I sent to the Federal Aviation Administration regarding alternatives at the airport. Any responsible journalist would have called me for my views before the opinion was published. In this case, the editorial writer elected not to call me for my views or the history that led to the letter’s being sent.  

Had the writer contacted me, she would have discovered that I was approached by Hailey’s representatives on the Friedman Memorial Airport Authority about the necessity of issuing a letter in response to the seven site alternatives.  I met with the city’s representatives on the Airport Authority and we settled on an outline for the letter. The letter was sent to all city members of the Airport Authority and the entire City Council for their review. I did not receive any substantive critical comments on the letter. Therefore, the letter was sent. After the letter was sent, the issue of the city’s position about the proposed sites was placed before the City Council on Dec. 3. At that meeting, all the City Council members and I unanimously voted to uphold the letter as written. 

The airport’s engineer was present at that same City Council meeting. He was asked whether he would ever build an airport like Friedman near a city, given various and obvious geographic problems, namely mountains. He advised that he would never build an airport like Friedman at the present site. In light of the demand at the airport and the types of aircraft using Friedman, the city’s view remains that the airport was built in the wrong place and is dangerous; nothing about that will ever change. Therefore, the city’s position is that we would like a safer airport away from our population centers.

Having said that, the city also recognizes, as expressed in my letter, that we understand our area needs an airport, and that this need is important for the economic benefits of our community. The letter then goes on to state that in the short and medium term, the city supports alternatives at the airport that make commercial traffic possible and viable. Accordingly, we supported options six and seven, both options of which can be done at the least cost while not expanding the footprint of the current airport. We also supported a planning process for the alternatives. 

The city did not support options one through four (i.e., shift runway and highway east, shift runway east and highway west, shift runway west, and shift runway south and rotate) because those options were very costly and construction could not be completed by a deadline set by Congress to meet a safety standard. Worse yet, options one through four would have had serious impacts to our citizens, which we cannot endorse. 

Option five (shift runway 1,700 feet south) might have been completed by the deadline set by Congress to complete improvements, but that option would have required construction “outside of the fence.” Currently, the joint powers agreement signed by the city and county does not allow for options outside the fence. Also, option five could result in larger planes coming into the airport.  Finally, moving the airport runway south simply shifts impacts to the city of Bellevue. In reviewing airport options, moving our impacts to another city is not a civilized or tenable position.

As usual, whenever any airport issue is discussed in the Idaho Mountain Express, your editorial mantra focuses on economics. Contrary to the Mountain Express’s opinion, the city believes that the economic health of our community is important, and the airport is part of that equation. However, the Mountain Express utterly fails to mention any concern about the health and safety of south-valley people who deal with airport impacts and the unavoidable dangers of living next to an airport. The city tries its best to balance economic issues with safety issues. I suggest your paper do the same. At least there might be some perception that you care about south-valley people.  

The city of Hailey leaders, now and  in the future, have a duty toward our citizens. That duty is simple—make the city of Hailey the very best place to live. I fail to see how we satisfy this duty by putting down more pavement, moving state highways and displacing citizens from their homes, all in the “hope” of bringing a few more people to the valley. Government should protect neighborhoods and promote safety. In this case, bigger does not mean better.


Fritz X. Haemmerle is the mayor of Hailey.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads





Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.