Wednesday, December 19, 2012

More information needed from URA


Is it possible that “less is more” for Ketchum’s Urban Renewal Agency: The less information available to the public, the more likely people are to agree to its plans?  Certainly, the URA’s recent workshop asking for citizen input on future projects was an empty exercise lacking transparency and meaningful content.  For example: 

- Sun Valley Co.’s private property at River Run, annexed into Ketchum in 2010, was enthusiastically designated an urban renewal area at the time. Yet, the designation (questionable?) was not among the URA achievements touted at the workshop; in fact, few citizens realize it has taken place.  

- The public was asked for input regarding future URA projects, yet up-to-date financial projections to assist our thinking was unavailable.

- The projects suggested by the URA were, for the most part, insubstantial in terms of economic development and, in at least one case, not even eligible for URA funds.

There are other issues. Ketchum’s government website, the first logical information checkpoint, has no link to its separate URA website. A URA commissioner who sold URA bonds to his clients before becoming commissioner claims fiduciary responsibility to the URA at times and to his clients at others. The current “URA Assessed Value and Revenue Estimate” going forward is opaque—perhaps incorrect?  Check it out.   

URAs can be terrific tools for economic development and have been widely used in the United States.  Unfortunately, they can be manipulated for private interests or simply unsuccessful.  Whether that is true for Ketchum’s URA is hard to discern; the information compiled for public review is typically incomplete, out of date, inaccurate or spread across disparate documents, making public evaluation difficult. 

Jima Rice

Blaine County




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



-->
 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.