Wednesday, October 3, 2012

A best-ever move


The nation’s wildlands won this week when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to the Clinton administration’s Roadless Rule, which protected 50 million acres of roadless areas in national forests from development. Two lower circuit courts had previously upheld the rule.

Enacted in 2001, it prevented additional road building on federal forests that were already struggling to pay for the upkeep of existing extensive road systems. The rule’s net effect is to protect vulnerable wildlife habitats, to leave natural areas undisturbed and preserve recreational opportunities on public lands.

Extractive interests in Wyoming, one of the states that challenged the rule, and their co-litigant, the Colorado Mining Association, are howling about the impact of the court’s decision on mining and energy exploration.

Of course the decision may impact those activities, but it also will have the beneficial effect of protecting recreation and wildlands for future generations.

In 2008 in response to the Clinton rule and to the concerns of the state’s extractive industries, Idaho Republican Sen. Jim Risch negotiated with the federal government to allow the state to substitute its own roadless rules to protect more than 9 million acres of roadless forest.

A U.S. district court upheld the state’s plan in 2011. Some areas received more protection than they would have under the Clinton rule while others received less. It remains to be seen what, if any, effect the new U.S. Supreme Court decision will have on the Idaho plan.

One thing’s for sure. It will be up to future generations to judge the wisdom of protecting wildlands. We predict they’ll find it was one of the nation’s best-ever moves.




About Comments

Comments with content that seeks to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS may be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material may be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author may be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing, Inc.

You may flag individual comments. You may also report an inappropriate or offensive comment by clicking here.

Flagging Comments: Flagging a comment tells a site administrator that a comment is inappropriate. You can find the flag option by pointing the mouse over the comment and clicking the 'Flag' link.

Flagging a comment is only counted once per person, and you won't need to do it multiple times.

Proper Flagging Guidelines: Every site has a different commenting policy - be sure to review the policy for this site before flagging comments. In general these types of comments should be flagged:

  • Spam
  • Ones violating this site's commenting policy
  • Clearly unrelated
  • Personal attacks on others
Comments should not be flagged for:
  • Disagreeing with the content
  • Being in a dispute with the commenter

Popular Comment Threads



 Local Weather 
Search archives:


Copyright © 2014 Express Publishing Inc.   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.