TALK BACK: Now you can add YOUR comments about this article.

    print version     email

Friday, November 20, 2009

Wind turbines disfavored in scenic corridor

Vote on wind energy facilities slated for Tuesday


By JON DUVAL
Express Staff Writer

Though a final decision has yet to be made, the Blaine County Commission made it clear this week that it does not favor allowing wind energy facilities in the "scenic corridor," the area visible from state Highway 75.

It's the biggest issue the commission faces while continuing deliberations on a proposed ordinance regulating wind energy facilities. The meeting Tuesday at the Old County Courthouse in Hailey was the fifth public hearing on the issue and another, possibly the last, is set for Tuesday, Nov. 24, at 2 p.m.

While considering criteria for both freestanding and rooftop wind turbines, the commission showed a change in heart from its previous meeting on the ordinance.

At a meeting in August, the commissioners seemed amenable to the idea of allowing turbines in the scenic corridor, which runs north from Glendale Road in Bellevue, but reversed course this week, citing public opposition.

"If we're going to allow wind turbines, we need to have them accepted by the community," Commission Chairman Larry Schoen said. "We can't create a negative attitude toward wind energy. It's not just about creating electricity."

At the meeting, the issue drew plenty of public comment, with those against arguing that wind turbines along the scenic corridor would impair the natural beauty as people drive through the valley.

"We have gone to lengths to preserve views with the hillside ordinance and with the Forest Service's decision not to allow a cell tower on Galena [Summit]," Hailey resident Peter Lobb pointed out.

Those in favor said wind energy is becoming more accepted around the world and that people not only wouldn't mind seeing the turbines, but would hail them as evidence that the community is taking progressive steps for energy conservation.

The commissioners also discussed criteria for turbines, including the maximum heights allowed on different sizes of properties.

Schoen proposed that turbines up to 40 feet should be allowed on properties of five acres or more without requiring a conditional-use permit. That would mean that property owners with large enough lots would be able to install a 40-foot, free-standing turbine or a rooftop turbine that doesn't reach above the 40-foot mark without being required to go to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearing.

Jon Duval: jduval@mtexpress.com


    print version     email


There are 14 comments


The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing Inc.
Good jobDREW
11/20/09 - 15:15

I'm with Drew
Its his future and his kids and at some point we may have no choice but have wind tubines.
As for the bird watcher how many birds have you hit driving your vehicle?
Guess what there are lots more vehicles on the road then just yours so put that issue to rest.
Its time for a change and the time has pasted.

Arnold
11/20/09 - 14:58

I don't want those ugly things here. Put them in California.

kat w – bellevue id
11/20/09 - 11:47

I'm with Drew - and I'm a mom with kids in college and we raised them here. But I've always wondered, if the view in the highway corridor is so damn precious, whoever allowed all those berms in there?

Hold On
11/20/09 - 11:26

I don't believe anyone ever proposed "giant wind farms" or 200-foot wind turbines. Where did those comments come from? A 30-foot turbine on a residential lot in this valley certainly isn't going to kill any California condors.

Bluecollar
11/20/09 - 10:19

What a joke. The environmentalist won't let us drill because it's bad for the planet, yet the Chinese can drill off the coast of Florida and take our oil, but when it's time to use "green energy" people like the late Senator Kennedy wouldn't allow wind turbines off the coast of his mansion. The US is becoming a third world nation because the left is willing to destroy our economy while China and India prosper by our stupidity. Why not let our oil companies get our oil, instead of countries who could care less about environmental impact. Do you really believe that China cares about the Florida coastline? We're slowly killing our economy, alternative energy sounds good, but even if they did put up wind turbines they are only effective 30% of the time. Trust me if I had oil in my backyard I would drill in an instant so that my kids might have a shot at an economic future. The "green energy" promise is not happening soon and neither is our economic recovery.

Wiegand – Redding
11/20/09 - 09:58

The Ugly Truth About the " New Safer Prop Wind Turbines" - A must See Video............I am an expert on Birds of Prey. For all the "green energy" believers out there, this is a video you have to see. Each year across America thousands of eagles, hawks, owls, falcons, vultures and condors perish at "green energy" wind farms. This video will open your eyes and your mind when you see how easily a soaring vulture is smashed by the innocent looking blades of a prop wind turbine. Most prop wind turbines have blade tips speeds of approximately 200 mph. This video illustrates why all birds and bats do not have a chance near the spinning blades of a prop turbine. There has been a wind industry cover-up about the bird mortality problem for decades. Most wind farms have very high security so images like this can not be seen.

fatal accident with vulture on a windmill
www.youtube.com

The prop turbine in this video is not even spinning at full speed. It is spinning at 12 rotations per minute. At full speed it will spin at 20 rotations per minute making this wind turbine even more dangerous to anything that happens to fly by. This is why each year across the world, millions of birds and bats are killed by prop turbines.

Fraud is commonly used in the permitting process for every wind farm. I recently came across this fraudulent statement used by the wind industry in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the PDV Wind Project in Kern County, CA "Scientific literature also suggests that diurnal vultures, such as the California condor, are not at substantial risk for collisions with wind turbines."

The scientific community is very aware that each year thousands of vultures of every type are slaughtered by prop wind turbines. The numbers of dead vultures worldwide indicates that these slow flying gliders are not at all able to "skillfully" avoid the 200 mph tip speed a prop wind turbine as claimed in the Final PDV EIR. This video clearly demonstrates the danger prop wind turbines are to all birds, especially the California Condor.

Kern County recently gave the wind industry a permit to construct the large PDV prop wind turbine farm in condor habitat. A decision on another large prop wind farm, the Alta Oak Wind Project, will be given in November 09. It too will be located in condor habitat.

The public is not aware that there are alternative wind turbine designs available that do not slaughter our precious wildlife and also produce much more energy. One of them is produced by Environmental Technologies LLC. If the corrupt entities of Wall Street, Washington, and our courts were not protecting this industry, this terrible problem would already be resolved.

Prop turbines are all about functional obsolescence, planned obsolescence, and most of all greed. The outdated technology of the prop wind turbine needs to be exposed for the fraud it represents to the green energy movement.

Reply to Wiegand
Drew
11/20/09 - 13:39

So what worse? A few birds hitting wind mills or an oil spill, or the constant spewing from a coal plant. There's no comparison. Just mount a few high pitched audio devices on the turbines to scare away the birds, just like they do at airports...duh.

kevin
11/20/09 - 07:22

The dams resticted movemnt of the salmon so they could not spawn in traditional areas thus begining the cycle of extinction. We're doing it the other way. By not doing what we can we hasten our own extinction. I think we should listen to the kid on this one.

Drew
11/20/09 - 06:59

I'm 12, I was born here, and I'm in shock. I can not believe that we are turning down a wind turbine project because of how it looks. That has to be one of the most selfish, idiotic, short-sight things I've ever heard. I would personally like to thank those involved for helping to destroy the planet. We talked about these turbines in my class, and everyone thought it was an awesome idea, we had no clue the project might be canceled because of how it might look. That has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It's really too bad that no one cares about the future. The same thing happened in Nantucket, and even people like Senator Ted Kennedy (one of the most liberal people ever), were against it because of how they looked. All I can say is....I can't wait until my generation is running the country, I guarantee you things will be different. I just hope you idiots leave us something to save.

Reply to Drew
bz
11/20/09 - 12:51

Careful Drew the Idiots are the ones teaching you the "facts". You may grow up and find out that you were taught the wrong things. Keep an open mind.

Reply to Drew
Reply
11/23/09 - 21:37

Drew,

You don't have to tell us your age. It's obvious from your comments.

Reply to Drew
Wiegand – Redding
11/25/09 - 09:54

Some of you are missing the point of this post. This is a problem that can be fixed. Worldwide Millions of birds die from collisions with prop turbines each year. Most are protected species. There has been a cover-up about this problem for decades so that wind industry investors could make billions off these eyesore killers. Modern and more efficient wind turbine designs exist that do not kill birds, yet these outdated prop turbines continue to be peddled by this corrupt industry.

Aj
11/20/09 - 06:39

I never would have thought the residents of our valley could put aesthetics above alternative energy. How can we ever lose our dependency on oil (foreign and domestic) when such petty issues as "scenic corridors" can put the kibosh on simple, inexpensive alternatives? Oh well, I guess our valley is really no different than anywhere else; we should be ashamed of ourselves.

Bob – ketchum
11/19/09 - 23:50

Giant 200 foot wind turbines gracing our landscape as you enter the valley does not seem like a good idea. They are fine in barren landscapes that have little else to offer.
Remember, at one time dams seemed like a brilliant idea, ask the salmon how they feel about that one.

Leave a Comment





?   ?



Comments with contents that seek to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS will be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of service or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

To report an inappropriate or offensive comment click here

 Local Weather 
Find on this site:

Other Sites

Follow IdahoMtnExpress on Twitter

Copyright © 2010 Express Publishing Inc. 
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.