TALK BACK: Now you can add YOUR comments about this article.

    print version     email

Friday, May 23, 2008

State approves plan to hunt hundreds of wolves

Fish and Game Commission decision launches new era in wolf management


By JASON KAUFFMAN
Express Staff Writer

Idaho Fish and Game photo The Idaho Fish and Game Commission approved a plan Thursday to open a hunting season on gray wolves starting on Sept. 15.

As many as 428 wild gray wolves will be allowed to die in Idaho this year under a plan approved by the Idaho Fish and Game Commission in Jerome on Thursday.

That's 100 more than originally proposed by staff biologists with the Department of Fish and Game prior to this week's much-anticipated meeting. Both tallies—the level proposed by Fish and Game staff and the higher number approved by the politically appointed commissioners—would represent all reported wolf deaths in the state this year. It will include deaths from natural causes, accidents, wolf predation-control actions and hunter kills.

Speaking after the commissioners' consideration of proposed rules for what may be the first-ever managed wolf hunt in the state later this fall, Fish and Game director Cal Groen noted the significance of the decision.

"It's time to take a collective sigh," Groen said. "This is history."

Wolves living in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, eastern Washington, eastern Oregon and northern Utah were officially removed from protection under the federal Endangered Species Act on March 28. The delisting transferred management duties from the federal government to wildlife management agencies in the six states.

Groen said that despite the high number of wolves that could die under the approved plan, state wildlife managers will still manage the predator at levels higher than the federal government originally agreed was an acceptable level for recovery in the northern Rockies prior to their reintroduction in Idaho and Yellowstone National Park in 1995-96. The original plan stated that wolves would be delisted in the region when they achieved a minimum of 30 breeding pairs and at least 300 wolves split between the states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming for three consecutive years. That threshold was achieved in 2002.

As of this spring, Idaho has more than 1,000 wolves statewide, Fish and Game estimates.

Idaho's wolf management plan calls for managing wolves at a population level of 500-700 wolves for the first five years following delisting. The plan envisions using hunting as one of the primary tools to control the population.

Even if the 428 figure is reached, the state will have far more than the federal government originally proposed, Groen said.

"We're saying we are going to be at least five times above (federal) government recovery levels," he said.

But still hanging over the entire discussion of wolf management in Idaho and the other states is a lawsuit filed by 12 conservation groups in April that seeks to overturn the delisting decision. U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy is set to consider the lawsuit during a May 29 hearing in Missoula, Mont.

Groen contended that overturning the delisting would be detrimental to Idaho as well as future endangered species recovery.

Also Thursday, Fish and Game commissioners set the statewide season for wolf hunting this fall should conservationists fail to overturn the Northern Rockies delisting. In this first year, hunters will be able to pursue wolves from Sept. 15 to Dec. 31. From Sept. 15 until Oct.1, only Idaho's backcountry areas in the Frank Church-River of No Return and Selway Bitterroot wilderness areas will be open to wolf hunting. Hunters will be able to use any weapon during that time.

From Oct. 1 through Dec. 31, all of Idaho will be open to wolf hunting and hunters will be able to use any weapon.

According to Fish and Game, achieving the quota would result in an estimated population of 500-700 wolves at the end of 2008.

Though some commissioners indicated they'd like to see a longer season, in the end they chose to take what they deemed a more "cautious" approach. However, during their upcoming November meeting, the commission will consider whether to extend the season depending on how it's progressing.

"It seems like a good compromise," said Cameron Wheeler of Ririe, the commissioner representing the Upper Snake Region in eastern Idaho.

A provision of the proposed hunting rules Fish and Game commissioners approved states that once the statewide quota is reached, all hunting will cease. Similarly, once pre-set quotas in individual wolf hunting zones is reached, hunting in those zones will stop.

Under the rules, holders of Idaho hunting licenses and wolf tags would be allowed to harvest one wolf. The cost of a resident Idaho wolf tag will be $10.50.

Under the previously established mortality quotas for each management zone, as many as 50 wolves would be allowed to die this year in north-central Idaho's Lolo wolf zone, which covers Big Game units 11 and 12. In the Southern Mountains wolf region, which covers all of the Wood River Valley and extends east through the Pioneers, White Knob, Lost River and Lemhi ranges to the Montana border, Fish and Game originally set a mortality figure of 34 wolves for 2008.

But because the commissioners upped the statewide mortality amount, the additional 100 deaths will be spread out among all the state's wolf zones.

Fish and Game will establish a hotline for hunters to call in to find out if the wolf quota has been met in the wolf zones and statewide. Hunters will be required to report the taking of a wolf within 72 hours after it's been harvested. Fish and Game will require that external evidence of sex be left attached to the animal's hide until the mandatory check requirement has been satisfied. Though hunters will not be required to retrieve meat from a harvested wolf, they will have to present the animal's hide and skull to a Fish and Game regional office within 10 days of the kill.

Under the proposed rules, wolves will not be allowed to be harvested by trapping or through the use of bait, electronic calling or dogs. While radio-collared wolves will be allowed to be shot, Fish and Game is asking hunters to avoid harvesting them so it can continue to monitor them.

In the end, Groen asked for the trust of everyone as Idaho wildlife managers embark on this new path of managing wolves. He said wolves join a list of 11 other big game species Idaho managers must keep watch over.

"I think our staff are very good managers," he said.


    print version     email


There are 45 comments


The comments below are from the readers of mtexpress.com and in no way represent the views of Express Publishing Inc.
native
06/03/09 - 06:21

There is room for cattle and sheep on the public ranges, my ancestors have ran cattle for over 100 years. the deer and elk are all leaving because of the wolves and motor bikes.
Also you wolf lovers need to show the wolves where private land is. They have no place with my animals and my pets. The program was too successful.

boulderGhost
06/03/09 - 01:37

Black Diamond-
I have all the "authentic data" I need about wolves: I know of 4 dens I will be visiting with my tag holding friends, I know my .300wsm is dead on at 200 yds. 3 inches low at 300yds. I know that many who disagree with you will "accidently" gut shoot as many wolves as the can before tagging one, I know the ignorant, self serving agenda of so called wildlife "experts" and vegan, disney brainwashed, star child, "into the wild" wannabee, idiot transplants from the suburbs of California can suck it. Im going huntin'. It's what Idahoans do. Now, remember to wear orange this Fall......WORD.

Kill em till they die from it!
05/05/09 - 20:46

Is there an open season on "pro wolfy's"? I think they are just all jealous because they don't own a gun to go bring a wolf hide home for themselves. They aren't good for anything. Lets just get rid of them all and be done with it. Why haven't we heard of any stories of conservationists trying to protect dinosaurs from becoming extinct? Oh, ya. Because they weren't good for anything and they destroyed everything in their path! Hmmm.... Sounds like wolves are the new dinosaurs! Kill em all dead! Nobodys gonna miss them.

Reply to Kill em till they die from it!
Ben K from SV
10/21/09 - 12:05

Do you understand that you are stupid. The Dinosaurs were extinct 6 million years ago from a natural event. And yes they were good for something. Everything in the world that is natural is good for something. It is how life works. You think that the wolves are not good for anything? they keep elk population below a threatening population. If there are too many elk then they eat away all the shrubs and baby trees by the river bed. Causing errotion and destruction of the rivers. Also, without the trees providing shade for the river, there are no longer a type of fish that live there. In addition, the reeds that the elk eat are gone and that is making a speices of song bird leave the valley. Why must people like you be that selfish...... Ask yourself this question

Laughing
03/25/09 - 12:03

Interesting to see this story from last year. Since delisting has been delayed, more wolves will have to be killed to keep them out of unsuitable habitat. What has DoW and other groups accomplished with their lawsuits? More wolf deaths. There is only so much room in the wilderness and wolves do belong there - they don't belong in subdivisions.

Cowboy
02/10/09 - 10:23

Anon,

Those early scholars did not agree with the majority of their time that the earth was flat.. The ruling blue blood elite were wrong then as they are wrong now. That period was also pre-reformation era, those scholars bringing forth new sciences at that time in history were presecuted, killed, Paul and Peter both were beheaded, Galileo was punished for his findings which were found to be accurate many years later...We return to this Dark New World Order era shortly, and in fact many good findings have been suppressed even in this Reformation period as well, Tesla, Moray, just for starters..Intelligent Creation can not be refuted if the research is honest.. One cannot understand The book of Daniel nor Revelations without the help of Strongs and Knochs Concordance Hebrew correct word dividing, as well one needs a knowledge of ancient symbology, sex and the stars and the hegelian double speak or your lost in research...finding nothing except establishment lies.. Who persecuted them..the RCC..The Beast from Rome..

hmm – ketchum, id
02/10/09 - 07:55

99% of all scientists believe in evolution.
i cant believe u guys live on the same planet as me.

Reply to hmm
Anon.
02/10/09 - 08:49

It's hard to believe scientists when one is raised to believe a bronze age book written by primitives who thought the earth was flat. The majority of humans are still too simple to be rational. Many do not see that the slight variations in every human is evidence of evolution. If species are fixed, we'd all look identical.

Wolf populations, by their isolation, EVOLVE into subspecies specifically suited to their ecosystems. When one takes a subspecies from one area and puts it into another it is not suited for, you get the problems we see in the west. Even many so-called "scientists" are blind to this fact. They work for the FWS.

Laughing
02/08/09 - 13:55

Now the wolf lovers will have the opportunity to adopt a pack of our wild fuzzy puppies. Kudos to our State rep's for voting in the new bill. Take our Wolves, Please!

Folks in the cities are not the ones who are losing their pets, yet they want to tell us how to live. They want us all locked up behind big fences and afraid to go out, just like they are in the big city.

You should all experience the "joy" of having a pack of wolves surround your home during the night, and howl every time you make a noise to try and "shoo" them away. They are not afraid of us.

Greg farber
02/08/09 - 08:18

Yep sure, maybe you mean research like this, Seven things you are unaware of concerning the " Humane Society of the United States", not so humane it seems..your all owned and this wolf program is exposed for what it is...
www.consumerfreedom.com

www.skinnymoose.com

The Canadian species of wolf is incorrect for the lower 48, there are 32 known subspecies world wide, with North America haveing 24 subspecies, this species is not the species which was here prior to this scam..

Reply to Greg farber
Cameron J – Ketchum, ID
10/21/09 - 12:29

That is absolutely untrue. Before we started wiping out wolves ever since we settled America, the "Canadian" species was the SAME as the "American" species. We drove them out, and now we introduced the SAME species back into America. Do some research from credible sites.

Reply to Greg farber
Cameron J – Ketchum, ID
10/21/09 - 12:30

That is absolutely untrue. Before we started wiping out wolves ever since we settled America, the "Canadian" species was the SAME as the "American" species. We drove them out, and now we introduced the SAME species back into America. Do some research from credible sites.

104 is not enough
01/29/09 - 17:36

Heart and feelings for the wolves? How about heart and feelings for the ranchers who are putting meat in the grocery stores, restaurants, feeding America!!!!!!!!
Lets see the Hearts and feelings for the wolves, when they come in and kill your Dogs and Cats, there was already an uproar about a Cougar doing it!!!!!!!!

Reply to 104 is not enough
Nutz
01/29/09 - 18:15

Hmmm... nope. Still don't care about ranchers. Sorry, they get too much of my money anyway and I DON'T EVEN EAT THEIR PRODUCT

Reply to 104 is not enough
Black Diamond
01/29/09 - 19:26

You are afraid of wolves. You need to be brave and toughen up. Act like a true Idahoan, you know the ones with all the big talk and stains in your undergarments. The Idaho meat/ranching industry production lags way behind flat lands farther east. Take some time and find out about the issue, be cautious of special interest groups with "the sky is falling rhetoric". Get authentic data, and then decide about an issue. It will be your reality and your truth.

Reply to 104 is not enough
Bea Elliott – Florida
02/07/09 - 22:03

Perhaps if we are running out of sufficient room to grow the cows - we might consider adopting a different, more sustainable plant based diet? This is the way to evolve while continuing to co-exist with other inhabitants on this earth. Unless all you want to have left on it is a bunch of McDonalds & Burger Kings? I'd much rather eat my veggies and let the wildlife be. Go Vegan.

Reply to 104 is not enough
Ben K from SV – Ketchum, ID
10/21/09 - 12:17

First of all, the ranchers are working with the biologists to help their live stock co-exist. Do yourself a favor and look up the importance of wolves and other major predators.

Reply to 104 is not enough
Cameron J and Ben K – Ketchum, ID
10/21/09 - 12:36

Domestic dogs alone kill five times as many sheep as wolves. By far, the leading killer is disease, and under that bad weather.

idiocracy
01/29/09 - 15:29

Sure hope they'll be a lot of hunting accidents... Darwin always prevails!

Reply to idiocracy
Greg farber
02/08/09 - 15:29

I think you better read Miltons Shattering the myths of Darwinsim, Tsarions books and DVDs, Graham Hancock's book's, Darwin himself admitted the Human did not fit his model of Evolution, Darwin was a fraud....he prevailed on his death bed begging his Lord Jesus Christ to forgive him for the evil he had done, documented historical fact...To bad your Public Indoctrination center of lies left this out of their text books...The truth is only strange when you have been indoctrinated with lies....The truth will prevail and this deceptive belief system will crumble....keep watching...

Reply to idiocracy
Anon.
02/09/09 - 14:21

idiocracy - walk deep into the Frank Church unarmed. Greg Farber can show you where the wolves live so you can pet one.

Darwin was indeed wrong. Everyone knows it was the aliens from Zeta Reticuli that intelligently designed the Cro-Magnons, which mixed with Neanderthals and gave us politicians.

Reply to idiocracy
Cowboy
02/10/09 - 09:50

If the Tsarion theory is correct then explain humans prior to your "alien" intervention..As you know the Neanderthall came later than this "interference"...Or Nephilim as their known to be...Like Jesuit Darwin, Tsarion is an Mason, Knight, and idiot... Now who really gains from this bull pocky...Could it be the anti-christos RCC...

Reply to idiocracy
DUTCH FIST
08/04/09 - 18:16

All you patchouli oil smelling, down town Boise living, ticket holding freinds of Dorothy need to wander your little narrow butts out into the woods and go make freinds with the wolves. Go throw the stick, and get into tickle fights with one of these things. Then tell me how much you like being a quad amputee if you live. Yay go wolves!

roe – newyork
01/28/09 - 18:09

you guys have no heart no feelings for these wolfs think twice what your doing . rember you will pay in the end.

Reply to roe
Kayla – Boise, ID
04/08/09 - 12:14

It might be too late afterwards for them to pay. What they need to do is realize what's going on right now and stop it before it gets BAD.

Gregus Maximus Farberous
10/09/08 - 10:27

Yep, what a beautiful plan, loose an unmanaged predator upon the hooved ungulates of Idaho, spending millions in the process in a decaying economy, spreading lies how they only kill the sick and weak, even though eye-witness accounts prove other wise, the wolves will irrefutably kill off all Idaho's elk as predicted, the elk herds of generations of rebuilding after the decimation of the late 1800s and early 1900s due to a combination of over predation by both man and beast. Now the beast gets free reign and little is left for man to manage by harvest or other wise. Once abundant elk herds are now a scarcity, thank goodness we have photographs and prints of majestic elk for our grand children to see what Idaho lost by kill every thing wolves who finally starved themselves out or moved onto other food sources.

Dave
10/08/08 - 16:36

Yes, this is a great idea? We sped years trying to repopulate a dying species and then mark them for death. Maybe next year the other problems in our society can be hunted. I know plenty of places to find predators that harm our society on a much greater level (IE: robbers, rapist,drug dealers, ect)

Danscaper
10/01/08 - 22:15

The wolf needs to be hunted and the fact is that 99.9% of all the people who think that they shouldnt are the people that have no idea what these killers are doing to the areas that they populate. They think that they do because they go on a weekend hike 5 times a year and have never had to deal with them. I spent weeks in the woods watching what the wolfs were doing, and they do sport hunt. I watched them kill 2 elk and were chasing anouther before I lost them. They werent killing for food they were killing for fun. It does not make since that these idiots want to keep them on the list. All you are going to get out of it is more animals to put on the list. Then what, you realize how dumb it was and get to say opps we messed up. Dont be stupid, get the facts to what is really happening and then speak. The one thing that all these pro wolfys are right about is that God will keep them in check, and he will do it threw mans hands.

Reply to Danscaper
idiocracy
01/29/09 - 15:33

Are these wolves going to come into your home and kill your loved ones? Steal your credit? Oh wait, you're a dumb hick. My bad....

saveelk
05/26/08 - 22:49

Ive been arguing with other pro-wolf groups over the amount of elk that wolves sport or binge kill. Even the pro-wolf crowd agrees to wolves killing 1.8 elk per month. Our website incorporates a study that says the number is a much higher number of 3.0 elk killed per month per wolf.

The greater the number of wolves, the more surplus elk killed, and yes, other ungulate are surplus or sport killed in the same way. Our fragile wilderness can handle a finite amount of predator killing before the ecological balance is threatened. The number of wolves allowed in approved wolf management plan - 150 for Idaho, 450 for the three states of Idaho, Montana and Wyoming can be tolerated without ecological damage. What you and your pro-wolf brethren are suing for, is for a minimum viable level of 3000 to 5000 wolves. You are oblivious to the devastation that these outrageous numbers will inflict on our wildlife.

Even at the pro-wolf agreed upon wolf kill rate of 1.8 elk per month; this equates to 5,400 to 9,000 elk killed per month, and a whooping 64,800 to 108,000 elk killed by wolves per year. If this doesn't get your attention then you are beyond all hope.

If wolf advocates had any compassion for other wildlife other than their beloved wolf, they would back off their lawsuit and support the IDF&G and USF&W in enforcing the approved wolf management plans.

John
05/26/08 - 08:57

Cant believe any one would alowe a wolf,to be killed,arent they part of the eco system,that nature depends on? ok maybe a farmer if the wolf is munchin his live stock,but they are HARMLESS,decent,animals,i use to have one i found years ago as a pet(more of a best friend) they dont go after humans less they are seriously challenged,they dont bother any one cept like i said the farmer,so why the hell are we killing them off?
Good grief,you cant eat them,and what to make a coat out of them? i find this be to crewl,and not needed to kill such a beautyful,wonderful animal that nature gave us to enjoy,and love,would you kill and hunt a dog? they are also super inteligent,loving and caring,again i had a timber wolf, a shame,yet we alowe people to have a hybred wolf,thats nasty,vicious,agressive,and dogs and wolves are not ment to be bread,doesnt mix,very sads to see this,i lived out west years ago,and couldnt believe this article about hunting a poor wolf!

Reply to John
Brian – Rexburg
09/24/08 - 15:17

Todays world is diffrent than it was 100 years a go. The major difference is us. Back in the day the elk didn't live in the mountains they lived in the valley. were we live now. The other difference is there was checks and balences back then. The wolf population got to big they starved and died. Then the elk population grew and so did the wolf population. That was because that was their major source of food. But now we come into the picture along with our cattle, sheep, and other animals and the wolves when they start to starve start to hunt cattle. The cattle are easier to hunt and can run because they a fenced in. The checks and balaces are off. And we (the hunters) may not eat the wolves but I personaly lover the taste of deer or elk roast. Apparently the wolves like it to. That is why I think that wolves should be removed, and then hunted, from the endagered species.

Former Resident – Oregon
05/23/08 - 22:23

WOOHOO gonna get me a wolf this fall. I'm gonna hang its pelt on the wall of my Dad's house above the fireplace. DIE WOLF DIE!! HAHA

Reply to Former Resident
Soylent Green
06/22/08 - 19:57

Your dad must instruct you on how to use your toy store computer. He also needs to install a sense of humor into your portal!

Tony Mayer – Twin Falls
05/23/08 - 17:47

Some feel that hunting is immoral or inhumane, and that hunting should be severely curtailed or prohibited. Some also feel that wildlife ecosystems will be better served by curtailing and limiting hunting and that predators, such as the wolf, should be allowed to effectively manage game populations without any intervention. They believe that wolves are intelligent creatures and are more efficient in the management of game species than is man. This thinking is fatally flawed.
History has proven that species management is necessary to protect and maintain healthy, vibrant game populations. This is why we have an Endangered Species Act; to recognize and use intelligent, unemotional management techniques to ensure the long-term viability of a threatened or endangered species. Management allows man to ensure that the proper predator-prey balance exists in nature necessary for all species to prosper.
As far as the question as to which is the best method to effectively manage big game populations; using hunting or allowing unabated predator population expansion? Throughout the world, hunting is widely acknowledged an accepted as the best and most effective way to manage and control game populations. This fact is indisputable. Proper use of hunting, balanced with proper predator controls, can ensure that all species including predator and prey survive over the long run. Conversely, lack of predator management, especially in the case of the introduction of the top-tier Canadian Gray wolf predator into Idaho, will result in exponential predator population growth with the predator eventually consuming and depredating its prey base.
In the case of how to best manage wolves and big game in Idaho - hunting seasons are an effective tool for our Idaho Fish and Game to regulate big game populations by varying the amount of hunting permits they allow in certain areas. IDF&G monitors game herds and regulates the issuance of permits and tags as necessary to properly manage our states� big game population. They issue tags directed at a certain age group or gender (i.e. bull�s only tags if they believe the area has more bulls then is optimal.) Additionally, the IDF&G will often curtail or close an entire area if the game count is below optimal levels. Under no circumstances will regulations allow young and defenseless game to be killed. In fact, the primary goal of hunting and game management recognizes that healthy reproduction and newborn survival is essential for the future continued viability of the game species. The ultimate goal of hunting is to manage game populations to ensure a vibrant healthy game population over the long run.
Currently in Idaho there are over 1000 Canadian Gray wolves responsible for killing more than 30,000 elk a year. Wolf numbers are increasing at over 30% per year. These "re-introduced" non-native Canadian Gray wolf hybrids are killing more elk than any other species including man. Wolves, by their very nature, are pre-programmed to kill game without any concern of sustainability of a prey species. They often kill for food, but recent evidence suggests that they more often prefer indiscriminate binge and reflex sport killing. Once they begin killing they have a propensity to continue on a killing frenzy until all the available prey has left an area or is dead. Wolves will usually move into an area and will first prey on easy targets such as the young and defenseless. Once the young prey is exhausted, they will pack up and then turn to killing the more mature adults. Once wolves start killing, binge and sport killing takes over and they continue until all available prey is exhausted. Under harsh winter conditions wolves will move into an area and literally wipe out entire ungulate herds where the game is trapped by heavy snow depths. This scenario resulting in depredation of Idaho elk herds has occurred in northern Idaho this winter. Entire drainages in the Clearwater area are now devoid of a single elk do to wolf depredation. This cycle is the beginning of a well known scientific phenomenon called a "predator pit" in which the prey base is exterminated.
This scenario will continue spreading throughout our Idaho wilderness if wolves are not scientifically managed at the approved State Wolf Management Plan levels. For all you pro-wolf advocates who are not satisfied �beware what you ask for." If you get your way in court and convince your hand-picked liberal judges to agree with you and mandate your position of the establishment of minimum viable population of 3,000 to 5,000 wolves, your very actions will lead to an explosion of the wolf population and lead to the eventual circumstances that wolves themselves will become extinct in the future.
I plead my case, let the IDF&G and the knowledgeable scientists manage the wolves at the levels they deem necessary.
www.saveourelk.com

Reply to Tony Mayer
John Apel – Arco, Idaho
05/24/08 - 08:39

If gray wolves are so devastating to elk populations in the present day, as Tony Mayer contends, I have to wonder how elk managed to coexist for thousands of years with wolves and other predators? Obviously they did then and I expect they will now. The reintroduction of wolves corrected a discredited policy of predator eradication.

I'm glad to have the gray wolf back in Idaho (and they're all gray wolves regardless of what side of the border they live on) as part of the native wildlife population of the northern rockies. I also have no problem with wolves being managed as a game animal. Hopefully the Idaho Fish and Game commissioners will refrain from acting on pressure from people like Ron Gillett and groups like saveourelk.com who want to eradicate all wolves. I bet 25 years from now we'll still have both elk and wolves and everyone will wonder what all the commotion was about.

Reply to Tony Mayer
John
05/26/08 - 09:06

Good comment buddy,i totally agree,lol your alot smarter than this guy,but loved all you wrote,with one comment to the hunters!
Years ago,and this is true,i believe i read this ina readers digest,will look it up so people will see this was a fact,any ways,some guy,from washington state,hunted wolf,shot and killed some poor wolfs mate,low and behold(this is how smart they are,protective,family oriented,and one of the few ways to get a wolf to go after or hurt you in any way,i had one i know)the male wolf,found this guy,im serious i read this in awe,and killed the guy who killed his mate,not sure if they killed this wolf or not(think they did,which is a valid reason for hunting and killing one)but point is they dont hurt a sole,they are territorial,but accept humans,i read in a book once,there has never been a unprevoced attack of any wolf in history,so frustrated,why kill them? again a farmer if hes munchin his live stock,but any other reason to me seems VERY wrong,would you kill your dog? and talk about problems,know how many animals,peoples pets,dogs cats etc,are abandon every year and put to sleep? thats a problem,wolves,nah,thing there kwel,harmless and part of natures system as you stated in your coment,way ta go,was great!

Tony Mayer – Twin Falls
05/23/08 - 17:42

Excerpt from USDA 2007 Wolf Activity Report (page 9) - RELATIVE LIKELIHOOD
OF PREDATION ON LIVESTOCK BY EACH SPECIES

"individual wolves were about 170 times more likely to kill cattle than were
individual coyotes or bears. Individual wolves were about 21 times more
likely to kill cattle than were individual mountain lions in 2005."

"individual wolves were on average about 21 times more likely to kill sheep
than were individual bears, about 7 times more likely to kill sheep than
were individual coyotes, and about 5 times more likely to kill sheep than
were individual mountain lions."

Carson Clark – Pocatello id /Ketchum
05/23/08 - 11:55

100s of wolves huh I have a better idea Lets just kill all wild life and just let cows and sheep have the mountains That way we will have a better view of things no squirls no deer no elk and for hecks sake no buffalo YA KILL THEM ALL Please FNG Think Why did we bring them back in the first place It was not for the Bush administraision I have seen wolves in the wild from just a few 100 feet They had no interest in me

Reply to Carson Clark
Black Diamond
06/22/08 - 20:04

Its sad to see graze animals in Idaho. They don't need pristine wilderness. They don't to be in the west at ALL. What does Ranching contribute to Idaho... A Big Nothing! Now Iowa definately. There is no honor in raising graze animals in Idaho, its a joke!

Reply to Carson Clark
Lisa Granden – Bellevue
10/09/08 - 10:32

Black Diamond- Ranching was here way before you. What do you contribute other than your selfish opinions? Probably not much. Some of us like to eat meat, some of us realize that ranching and grazing prevents uncontrollable range and forest fires. Now if the rest of you would get your facts straight you might see that. Stop being so closed minded. You don't know what you're talking about. Should we just import all our meat from China and let everything burn? Maybe your house would be the first to burn.

Reply to Carson Clark
Alf
01/29/09 - 15:59

Ranching is a total joke. It's the 21st century people. Find something new to do...

Reply to Carson Clark
john
05/06/09 - 08:33

reply to lisa:
Ranching is fine. Just keep your critters on YOUR land and off of public land. Public land grazing is an abomination. It destroys the habitat and watersheds. If a Rancher can't make it profitable without a government subsidy then that rancher should get into another line of work like the rest of us.

Reply to Carson Clark
George
06/02/09 - 20:49

It was a mistake to reenter wolfs.The are killing of are elk moose and deer population .Let alone raising havoc on ranch live stock. They also these animals to lose a lot of weight during the winter chasing them. We were doing fine without them.

Reply to
woof woof
05/23/08 - 13:34

Grow up Carson Clark, It's called MANAGEMENT!! Go cry to someone who cares.

Leave a Comment





?   ?



Comments with contents that seek to incite or inflame may be removed.

Comments that are in ALL CAPS will be removed.

Comments that are off-topic or that include profanity or personal attacks, libelous or other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. Entries that are unsigned or contain signatures by someone other than the actual author will be removed. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of service or any other policies governing this site. Use of this system denotes full acceptance of these conditions. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

To report an inappropriate or offensive comment click here

 Local Weather 
Find on this site:

Other Sites

Follow IdahoMtnExpress on Twitter

Copyright © 2010 Express Publishing Inc. 
All Rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Express Publishing Inc. is prohibited. 

The Idaho Mountain Express is distributed free to residents and guests throughout the Sun Valley, Idaho resort area community. Subscribers to the Idaho Mountain Express will read these stories and others in this week's issue.